Why the SNP should be glad that Ed has won..

This is going to be a slightly controversial post, but let’s take a wee step back and examine what just happened this week in the Labour Party and what this means for the North British Branch. Apart from the high profile David M supporters ( Murphy, Sarwar, Bain, Harris..) , many in Scottish Labour are highly delighted at Miliband Minor’s win and the very public break with the New Labour brand, calculating that this will bring electoral rewards next May. That level of optimism verging on arrogance and complacency will only help our campaign, as Scottish voters don’t like being taken for granted.

However, what if Labour’s strategy for the next five years is to stop drinking Southern Comfort and sup Boddingtons, Newcastle Brown and Tennents instead ? Is a move to the left (actually the centre , it’s only the media that define the middle ground in politics to the right) going to prove a tonic to the troops but a turn off to the voters south of the border ?

When there’s a significant divergence between Scotland and England in terms of preferred political parties, then the pressure grows for change. Obviously the greater the vote for the SNP, the more legitimacy for independence and that is what we are all campaigning hard for. However.. what if.. Labour’s Year Zero (as their conference has seemed to be this week) and retreat to the heartlands gifts the ConDems their re-election but has Scotland rejecting them and their little liberal helpers completely ? The same level of pressure will build from all part of Scottish society and that delivered the parliament – not one political party can claim that result, it was a collective effort, the settled will of the Scottish people. We are moving to the next phase as the union is gradually and inevitably fragmenting.

 Incidentally one of the better quips from Labour conference was that well-known joker, Liam “there’s no money left” Byrne when he emphasised the importance of attacking the Tories instead of the Liberals – Business before Pleasure …

NEW LABOUR DONT GET SCOTLAND

The biggest political lesson to be learned this week is that still even after all these years New Labour just don’t get Scotland.

Firstly we had the Dark Lord Mandelson saying that Scotland will soon clamour for the public sector reforms already put in place in England – Er no thanks!

Then as if we didn’t know, Tory Blair – Sorry Tony Blair – puts the boot into Gordon Brown in an interview, followed by the revelations in his biography that he didn’t quite understand devolution.

  

Scotland has consistently rejected the Blairite reforms on public services such as Foundation Hospitals, school academies, and other reforms which are code for outsourcing and privatisation.  Indeed the example South of the Border is that these reforms have led to a reduction in services, so why should we go down that path? Even Scottish Labour haven’t put these forward when in government in Scotland, which begs the question – if their MSP’s recognise that their selections and elections would’ve been scuppered by openly advocating an advanced New Labour agenda, doesn’t that mean there’s a different dynamic in Scotland ? A different country perhaps ? Although that didn’t deter Wendy Alexander from championing home ownership at the expense of public sector housing investment – apart from PFI/PPP, the biggest failure of Scottish Labour is in housing policy. Remember this was devolved, and it’s entirely their failure to deal with the erosion of quality public housing through right to buy and insisting on stock transfer as the only game in town. An expensive and unnecessary delay that was an entirely political decision - instead of investing in council housing – and all because the public sector borrowing requirement had to be curtailed (cue ironic laughter).

Blair’s admission is more stark, when you consider the debate to move on from devolution is in the ascendancy.  It is obvious that Labour do not want to open the debate towards full financial powers or even Independence.

New Labour just doesn’t get it.   A political philosophy to suit natural Conservative voters was never going to have resonance here.

The debate thankfully has moved on both fronts, any move to towards a Blairite agenda will be a disaster for Labour.

David Mliband, the choice of both Mandelson and Blair to succeed as leader will turn voters in Scotland away in droves. Incidentally, your starter for ten as to who in Scottish Labour has turned their back on the ethos of democratic socialism and wealth redistribution is to examine the supporters list of the Heir to Blair…

FAREWELL TO A FRIEND

Today I said farewell to a friend, Jimmy Reid, as I attended his funeral in Govan.

As I have commented elsewhere, he was quite simply a giant n every sense of the word.

A number of occasions stick out in my memory.  Firstly in 2000, at the Annual Conference, I chaired a fringe meeting with him and Roseanna Cunningham as part of the launch programme for the Scottish Left Review Magazine.  He opened his remarks by saying that he was convinced that Scotland was on the road to Independence.  This was a full five years before he joined the party.  Everytime Jimmy was speaking at a fringe event the room was crowded.

At the STUC in 2005 held in Dundee, my proudest moment being an SNP member arrived when Jimmy announced he had joined the party.  He was on great form and the pride of every SNP person in the room was simply uplifting.

For me, coming from a family involved in Shipbuilding this was a profound moment, Jimmy always has and always will be held n the highest regard with anyone who has a direct or indirect connection with shipbuilding.

When he joined the SNP it was only right and proper that we nominated him to be the President of the SNP Trade Union Group, along with Billy Wolfe who helped founded the Group in the first place. I and Malcolm Balfour had the honour of proposing and seconding both.

  

From then on, escorting Jimmy to SNP events was a massive honour.  I once joked with Jimmy that our members practically bowed when they shook hands with him.

One of my political highlights to date was chairing a fringe meeting in 2006 with Nerys Evans of the Plaid Cymru Trade Union section, and now an AM in the Welsh Assembly, Bill Speirs, and Jimmy.  Jimmy started by saying he was a proud member of the Trade Union and Labour Movement, not the Labour Party, and for half an hour, without notes, spoke about how Labour had destroyed their founding principles and how and why he had joined the SNP, as we hold those principles.  He was utterly convincing that night, and held the audience who were hanging on his every word.

Jimmy’s contribution to Scottish civic life will never be forgotten, and as his funeral showed today, just how admired he was from across the whole of Scottish society.

As a number of commentators have suggested over the last few days, his rectorial address in 1972 is as relevant today as it was then.

The best tribute we can pay him is to make sure we hold the principles of that address, or as the First Minister called it today a masterpiece, in our hearts and minds as we resolve the issues brought about by the current financial crisis. Far too many people try to tell us that resistance is useless, that the forces of global finance and faceless power brokers can’t be beaten and that workers need to “adapt” (code for accept what’s on offer whether it’s job loss or pay freeze). He and the workers of UCS showed that collective, disciplined, articulate resistance can deliver a result that’s right for the workforce, right for the industry and right for the economy and our country.

So long Jimmy, you and your principles will never be forgotten.

THE COUNCIL TAX LOVERS

Who is ripping off Glasgow?  Well we now know who wants to.  The news this week that Glasgow Council Leader, Gordon Matheson wants to increase the Council Tax, is the most inept piece of political thinking there has been for a long time.

Let’s consider this.  The Calman Commission estimates that a 1 % increase in Council Tax equates to raising £20 million for all of Scotland’s Local Authorities.  Therefore to replace the £70 million the Scottish Government puts in would require at least a 3.5% increase in Council Tax.  So to even replace this revenue would require an inflation busting rise. 

At a time when the public are justifiably angry at having to pay for the Bankers Bail Out, to call for an increase in a piece of taxation that is fundamentally regressive is the economics of the madhouse.  With some Banks now recording huge profits, the debate should move onto who pays, and turning the screw on the CON DEM coalition.  A golden opportunity for Labour you may think.

But no, what we get is a demand for an increase in a regressive piece of taxation that is so unpopular the only people who want to keep it, are the unionist parties in Holyrood.

You couldn’t make it up!

Considering that Scotland local authorities spend £48 million on consultants alone, you wonder about priorities.

What was even worse was Councillors Matheson’s performance on Newsnight Scotland where he stated that there will be pay restraint for public sector workers.  So applying this logic, low paid Council Workers will be hit with a double whammy to pay the price of the Bankers Bail out and see their local services cut – a triple kick in the teeth.

This absurd piece of thinking only shows how unfit Labour are to run our country.  The more questions they are asked between now and next May, the more Glasgow and Scotland will reject them.

The case for progressive taxation, full financial powers and Independence for Scotland grows stronger.

THE SAFETY NET

This weekends newspapers would make one weep as story after story is all about the cuts to the Public Sector, as the CON-DEM Westminster Government continue their Butcher Knife assault for purely political philosophical reasons.

The only one of two countries in the g20 not to try and grow their way out of recession, the future is bleak.  Aided and abetted by elements of the media who support this crusade, and despite evidence to the contrary, would have us all believe that cutting public sector spending will reduce the deficit.  The Tory vultures attack on the NHS, Education and the rest ensures that their friends the spivs and speculators who brought about this current economic crisis will be last to pay their fair share.

It makes ones blood boil to read of those who benefited from free higher education to demand that this current generation of school leavers should pay tuition fees and/or a graduate tax.  Another story today, highlights the demand for the privatisation of Scottish Water – a fairly efficient public sector body – as the cult of right wing ideology grips the country.

It doesn’t have to be this way.  As a self confessed socialist in a civic nationalist social democratic party, and the most social democratic government Scotland has seen in over 30 years, the current situation presents opportunities as well as challenges, as we head into the Holyrood Elections next year.

What is socialism or even social democracy in the current context? For me it is about ensuring a safety net for those less fortunate in society.  That means continue the move to free prescriptions so the sick are not taxed, protecting public spending so that our services to the public are maintained, that our NHS and Education services, including Higher Education are free at the point of use, and creating apprenticeships to help young people into work, and to address our skill shortages.  A taxation policy that is progressive and fair.  Privatisation means that services are delivered less well and less often, and this can be evidenced; unlike the private sector is best mantra that underpinned the entire New Labour project. Note that the male apprentices to the architects of the Project are trying to secure the Labour leadership by deploying the “nothing to do with me guv” line.

 It is obscene that the poorest in our society are paying the price of the bankers bail out. Even the Big Lottery funds are being raided to steal money from community based projects and subsidise opera and ballet instead in an outrageous move to redirect funding to the big and vocal national arts and sports organisations whose interests serve elites rather than grassroots. Private schools will be able to access funding as charitable organisations but your local state school will be specifically barred as it’s in the public sector. Class war ? Look who’s starting it.

If New Labour at Holyrood is the answer it must be a daft question.  They are as stated in the latest issue of the Scottish Left Review a talentless, negative bunch, and at some point they will be asked to provide answers, as to what they would do instead of whining from the sidelines.

With Scotland in surplus, the case for Scotland having control of its own finances is unanswerable; the case for Independence grows stronger with each passing day of this malevolent Westminster administration. 

THE FIGHT FOR THE PUBLIC SECTOR

I have just returned from Bournemouth where I made my annual pilgrimage to the UNISON UK Conference.  The highlight was attending the Denis Goldberg fringe where he read from excerpts of his book, The Mission.  Another highlight was pointing out the difference between Council Tax freezes in Scotland from that of England, and I welcome the setting up of a Council Tax working group to look at this.

However, the consistent theme, was the fight for public sector service provision, with more and more services in England being outsourced, the fight for Scotland’s Public Sector remains and will I believe dominate public debate between now and the next Scottish Elections.

This will prove crucial as Osborne wields the butcher’s knife to the Budget, aided and abetted by his Lib Dem poodles.

This will require a strong and unequivocal response from the Scottish Government.  New Labour, who are trying to convince us that we have collective amnesia over what they did over the last thirteen years, in particular presiding over an unregulated market which brought about this mess, are desperately trying to position themselves to the left of the SNP, confirmed by a quite idiotic editorial by the Daily Record yesterday – even by their standards – who incredibly suggested that the SNP were in favour of a smaller state and smaller spending – TRIPE.

The SNP is well placed to meet the challenge head on.  Outflanking New labour who sooner or later will let the mask slip as they will sooner or later revert to type by demanding more outsourcing and PFI – having been responsible for saddling the country with a mountain of PFI debt already, by continuing to believe that in-house provision is best, as we have done with cleaning contracts in hospitals for example, has more resonance in Scotland, and with voters than believe that strong, accountable public services deliver the best services.

 The other challenge will be in protecting public sector pensions, which UNISON members and other Card carrying trade union members will hit the streets for if necessary.  Even I was speechless when I heard Nick Clegg talk out about gold plated public sector pensions, really?  The average public sector pension is £4000 a year, and the average for women is £2,600 – hardly gold plated.  The cost of public sector pensions in Britain is £4.1 billion.  The cost of tax relief for private sector pensions for the richest one per cent is a whopping £10 Billion.  So when I hear the Tory vultures and the Liberal poodles’ talk of us all being in this together, I just shake my head in disgust.

It was clear to me during the election that people are not willing to pay the price for the Bankers bail out. 

The fight starts on Tuesday when Gideon takes to his feet.  I believe that the SNP have a unique opportunity to show Scotland that there is a better way.

Let’s start by talking about tackling tax avoidance, the waste of hiring consultants – who are manly hired to hive off services, bring in a Tobin Tax, and above all cutting Trident.

BATTLE LINES

The battle lines are becoming clearer since the Liberals did the dirty deed with the Conservatives, and could lead to an interesting battle for the Holyrood Elections next year.

The Liberals, to paraphrase George Galloway, look set to get the mother of all hidings next year, for propping up a Government who are set to use a butcher knife to public services.  I am starting to believe that it is not altogether surprising given the authors of the Orange Book are now the leaders of the Lib Dems.  The proposed part privatisation of the Royal Mail is only the beginning I fear for public services.

It will be incumbent on all of us of a left of centre persuasion in Scotland to ensure that we protect our country’s vital services and infrastructure against these attacks from the Tory vultures, and their Liberal poodles.  The SNP are well positioned to be the social democratic champions.  All Lib Dem votes are up for grabs.

Labour in Scotland has many choices, but will I believe be also held to account for their lack of achievement at Westminster.  For a Party to have had two landslide majorities and one comfortable one to have failed on so many fronts will not be forgotten in the context of a Holyrood Election, where the understandable fear of a Tory Government was so prominent only a couple of weeks ago.

The disgraceful court decision regarding the BA strike, thankfully overturned today on Appeal, is a result of the last Westminster Government failure to bring about real change to employment law, and to bring some justice to working people.  An outrage for a party funded by Trade unions.

The idiocy of New Labour allowed itself to be attacked by the Tories from the left on civil liberty issues.

Even today the Holyrood Labour group have not grasped opposition, and stand accused of double standards.  Iain Gray complains about cuts to Health Service Jobs, yet his Finance Spokesperson, Andy Kerr, criticises the SNP Government for delaying Westminster cuts till next year.  Indeed only a few weeks into the SNP administration, New Labour demanded 4% efficiency savings, more than the SNP asked for.  Put simply you can’t ask for more savings then complain about cuts.  It is this lack of thinking and strategy which will ensure they have no credibility.

Next years elections will be determined by those who can stand up to the CON-DEM coalition.  The votes of those who ran, understandably, to Labour a few weeks ago as they were the least of the two evils, know they have a different choice for Holyrood.

A PROGRESSIVE REFLECTION

So I wasn’t able to blog during the campaign, I was so busy talking to voters on the doorstep, now that the blisters have rested, it is of course time to reflect on the result n Glasgow south west, and how we go forward.

There is no reason to blame voters for trying to block the Tory vultures from entering into Downing Street, and that was the clear message in the last few days.  Even at the polling station, some people said to me when I was asking for their vote – not today.

 This really gained ground in the last few days of the campaign when it looked like a balanced parliament was a real possibility, because for weeks I have never known so many electors who said they were undecided.  In a Westminster election, we must accept that some will vote for New Labour, warts and all, to prevent the Tories ruling the country.  To many of us of course this is a contradiction and we must ensure that should Scotland vote again in a Westminster election we hammer home the message that Independence means the Tories would never ever rule our nation again.

Sadly, it looks like Scotland’s efforts were in vain, and the lib dems look to be the poodles who if they do the dirty deed, will never be forgiven for a generation.

Yet,  

I support the progressive alliance proposal, should talks break down we must offer Labour a chance to govern, yes warts and all, because the clear, and overwhelming message from the election was the Tories are not wanted in Scotland, they are still a decontaminated brand, and have never been forgiven for the destruction they caused Scotland.  Indeed the Scottish voter would I believe be comfortable with the SNP reigning in New Labour from its right wing excesses.

This would of course require more maturity from New Labour in Scotland than what we have seen in the last few days.  To say that the SNP is irrelevant in an election and then claim that the result was a rejection of the Holyrood Government is frankly stupid, and kids no-one.  The Scottish electorate is more sophiscated than they are given credit for, and unfortunately the lazy analysis of the media in Scotland means that no-one has quite grasped that the Westminster and Holyrood elections are different and the electorate can distinguish between them. Also, the great unsaid truth is that there are many people who vote Labour who are entirely relaxed about an independent Scotland, even amongst the activists, who would welcome the opportunity to redefine what a Scottish Labour party would stand for in that new reality,

The next few days will determine the future of the UK, because I predict that if the CON/Lib Dem deal goes ahead, the Scottish people will run a mile at the earliest opportunity. If it is a progressive alliance the people of Scotland will reward us for complying with their wishes.

Over the next 12 months, the party with the values of social and economic justice, the values that say we do not need nuclear weapons, and the values of internationalism, will triumph, and that will be a victory for the SNP

ON YOUR MARKS

The Westminster Election can be officially called any day now, and as I stated at the UNISON Retired Members Hustings last week, you have to feel sorry for the electorate in England, such is the level of debate between the Tories and New Labour.

Why they believe in putting each others leaders in their material and posters beggars belief.  If the SNP is such an irrelevance why do they both direct so much fire on us?

Of course when they both promise big cuts in Public Spending, (even more than Thatcher did in the 1980's,) it is little wonder when you are told from Labour and Tory voters that they will not vote in this election on the doorstep.

The expenses debacle is still an issue, and the anger of the public is just as fierce as it was 6 months ago.

Elections are all about choices and values.  With the so-called big two bereft of ideas, or values, we must ensure that the SNP message is heard.

The need for a fiscal stimulus, protecting public services and spending, the need to to retain Attendance Allowance, and moreover, the need for political representatives to rebuild a relationship with the voters, by championing their communities, and cancelling the replacement of Trident, are all reasonating on the doorstep.

Only the Scottish National Party have the choices and values to properly represent the people at this election.

GLASGOW'S GOVERNANCE

I have delibrately waited to blog for a while, whilst the allegations and revealations concerning my employer settled down.  It could be that there is more to come.  But I feel now is the moment to comment, and after much reflection.

I will not comment on the private lives of any politician, and therefore will keep my observations in respect to Steven Purcell to the political.

In truth at this moment in time there is no silver bullet that can suggest there is corruption in the City Chambers.  However, corruption or no, there is poor governance.

Officials are given too much devolved powers over staffing structures, contracts awarded are not being reported to Committees, and the ALEO's do not need to enter into service agreements or purchase services from the Council, yet Councill Departments are compelled to do the reverse.  Why was the controversial contract awarded  for transport provision for City Building ever tendered for at all, when the Council has a transport section who could have provided this service?

Culture Sport Glasgow has failed, no private investment of note as been attracted, yet business leaders were invited onto the board.  

Interestingly only late last year did the Council admit that one of the reasons for setting up such bodies was to mitigate against equal pay claims.  An insult to employees.

At the May Day Rally two years ago the Trade Unions warned that the creation of such companies was the slippery slope to undemocratic, and unaccountable service provision.

The irony that Nicholas Ridley's dream of an enabling local authority was tested by New Labour in Glasgow is not lost on yours truly nor I suspect the voters.

If the death knell of the enabling authority is what comes out of this sorry affair, then the citizens of Glasgow will benefit.

LOSING THE PLOT

A perhaps predictable headline for this post, but I have been thinking over the last week or so that the recent developments at Westminster are part of a wider malaise within New Labour as they appear to stumble towards the Election.

Whilst acknowledging that some of the publicity that Brown receives from the English establishment is out of order, what was the rebellion actually about?  From what I can observe there is no political difference between the so-called Blairites, and Brownites.  Their biggest problem is they have no political narrative, and most importantly no real difference with the Tories.

Given Brown's admission to Darling to accept that big cuts are needed on public spending, surely we will hear no more nonsense of rip-offs campaigns?  Perhaps not.  Last weeks dreadful performance by the Holyrood New Labour Group, where they blame the recent cold weather on the SNP demonstrates that they have lost the plot too, if they ever had one!  As Michael Russell said to me only the other day, if the SNP had invented the light bulb, New Labour would attack this as an anti-candle device!

The statement that voting New Labour will lock out the Tories only has reasonance if there are actually big differences between the two.

The SNP now has a wonderful opportunity to show clearly to the voters that the SNP can make a big difference at a Westminster election.  The fight for our rightful share of public money, a vision that the unregulated market is not the only way to run an economy, that people can be put before profit, that a non nuclear Scotland can succeed and take its place in the world..

Thats what I will be doing in the next few months.

Meanwhile, the rest will be losing the plot.

PREDICTIONS 2010

As is customary, and I have been reminded about the success of my blog post making predictions, I thought i would come up with another effort.  Here goes;

(1) The New Labour Government will be ousted by a Westminster regime even more right wing than they are by a majority of over 70 - the good lady and I have a bet on this with a bottle of champers being the prize.  This will be as a result of fresh sleaze and economic mistakes.
(2) Gordon Brown and Iain Gray will no longer be the leaders of the British Labour Party or BLP (Scotland Region) by this time next year.
(3) The Tories will have less than 3 Scottish MP's in the General Election,  creating anther Doomsday scenario, which will usher in huge support for Independence.
(4) The Tories will end the year behind in most polls at a UK level.
(5) The Lib Dems will lose half their Westminster seats. They will come under huge pressure to support Independence after secret plans by New Labour and the Tories to oust the Scottish Government, and form a coalition are revealed.  The Lib Dems back a referendum for 2011 after initially voting it down.
(6) Glasgow's No.1 football team will go on a glorious run , and emerge victorious and win the First Division with a couple of points to spare. The Mighty Jags take points off the Old Firm in the first half of the SPL  season.
(7) The Evening Times sensationally back the SNP for the general election, after Glasgow is awarded Metropolitan Status by the SNP Government.  The Evening Times will run this as part of its Labour let Glasgow Down/ Rip off Scotland campaign.
(8) The SNP will win most votes in Scotland at the General Election, and polls comfirm throughout the year that the next Holyrood Elections could result in a landslide.
(9)  Holyrood the Musical will go into production, whilst a petition is launched to bring back Glen Michaels Cartoon Cavalcade.
(10) The SNP make the 20 seat target, and in Glasgow East, John Mason proves that lightning strikes twice when just like his Council seat ten years before he beats his by-election opponent twice, after a recount.  The SNP gains another two seats in Glasgow, before the real drama starts.  The tension mounts as Glasgow South West heads into its fourth recount.  After a tie is declared the result goes to a toss of the coin.  And the winner is ....................................

JIM'LL JINX IT!

After celebrating a year in office, lets have a look at Jim Murphy's record as Secretary of State for Scotland; 

On 8th July he met Diageo bosses and announced after the meeting that they were considering alternatives to job losses; two days later Diageo emphatically said they weren't.
 

In May he encouraged Scottish bids for the Future Jobs Fund saying “we simply cannot abandon a generation of young people to the scrapheap of unemployment”, and when they were eventually announced the Scotland Office claimed a majority are successful; in fact a majority were rejected and Scotland received less than its pro-rata share. 

There is excitement in the Highland & Islands after Jim Murphy implies that a cut-price petrol scheme may be on the way for the islands; nearly two weeks after Jim Murphy is denying any such scheme was the cards
 

Throughout 2009 a number of children are detained at the Dungavel Immigration Removal Centre despite Jim Murphy announcing in October 2008 a pilot scheme to ensure children were not held at Dungavel   

In May 2009 it is revealed that despite Jim Murphy being allowed to announce that the Labour government were to reverse their increase on whisky duty that he had failed to even lobby for the industry before Alistair Darling imposed the increase.
  

In August Jim Murphy says that he will sort out visas for Lahore Pipe Band refused entry into the UK for the World Pipe Band Championships in Glasgow; next day it is reported that he has failed to secure visas for Pakistanis

 May 2009 and Jim Murphy leads Scottish Labour leaders at the launch of party's Euro-campaign; the party goes down to what can be described as its worst result in a national election campaign since World War One.
 

June 2009 - Jim Murphy welcomes the Calman Commission's final report and praises its participants; ten days later a Labour party debate in the Scottish Parliament sees the Calman parties fall apart with Tavish Scott declaring he is not a unionist and that the report must not be kicked into the long grass, and Annabel Goldie saying the Tories will wait and see.
 

Jim  Murphy is clearly a Jinx, or his claims and comments are suspect. A bad spinner or a political jonah?

One last thing.  Jim Murphy has been telling everyone who is prepared to listen that the Westminster Election is a two horse race between New Labour and the Tories.....

The SNP currently lead in opinion polls in Scotland for both the Westminster and Holyrood Elections....

LESSONS OF THE BALLOT BOX

The most illuminating aspect of the avalanche of comments and opinions aired in the aftermath of the result of the Glasgow North East by-election, is how much people reveal about themselves and their political world view in their response to the events of last Thursday. Apart from the man of the hour himself (and congratulations are due to the newly elected MP, Willie Bain, although sadly, working people may learn that he is no friend of ours, as per my last post), there has been a singularly ungracious, immodest and gloating tone from many New Labourites that doesn’t sit well with the reality of having to throw everything bar the kitchen sink at this campaign, and then some.

Yes, New Labour can still win in its heartlands and turn out the core vote, but only after a massive effort, not just in terms of activist resource ( with a high dependence on paid party workers) but also dependent on large amounts of cold, hard cash. Why was the calling of the by-election delayed for months ?  So trade union donated funds could be spent before the election expenses clock started ticking.  Funding a political party that shafts them still defies logic but whether this can be replicated across Scotland, never mind the UK is open to question, given the state of the party’s finances.

Yes, the percentage share of the vote is comparatively high as it traditionally has been in this area, but it’s hardly a ringing positive endorsement when two thirds of the voters don’t show up.  Of course there’s the issue of the scale of negativity required to scare the voters into staying with New Labour – the politics of fear and tribalism, and a ludicrous campaign stating that our city is being ripped off. Both here and in Glenrothes, the successful Labour campaigns were built on finding somebody to blame – to distract the voters from Labour’s dismal record and the hapless performance of the man who has held the purse strings since New Labour came to power.  The man who has managed the incredible feat of widening the gap between the richest and poorest in our society and squandering the best chance a Labour government will ever have to deliver social justice. In other words, they resorted to a Campaign that would not look out of place with the US Republican Party.

Our task ? Persuading people that change is possible, it doesn’t have to be this way, a better Scotland is our vision, proudly articulated from the very start of any campaign and quickly but calmly rebutting the fears and smears , exposing them for the lies they are – you have to ask, what is it about our opponents that makes them fear the Scottish people so much that they have to resort to these tactics because they believe we are not to be trusted to govern ourselves ?

It wasn’t just a re-branding exercise but a fundamental shift away from a belief in redistribution of wealth to a wholesale embrace of market forces when the Labour party became New Labour, and some people, particularly the older generation, are voting for a memory of a party that no longer exists and our challenge is to spread our message of hope, of ambition, of our vision for a modern Scotland that reflects our proud history and is positive

and relevant – not fearful and mean.  We are the true inheritors of the values that created and informed the labour and trade union movement – unlike some, we really do believe it’s possible to  "Work as if you live in the early days of a better nation.".

THE REAL CHOICE FOR WORKERS IN GLASGOW NORTH EAST

As well as campaigning in the South West of the City, I have been out in Glasgow North East, and it is simply breathtaking, the anger that voters have for New Labour because the media would have you believe differently.

What is more astonishing is the level of negative campaigning adopted by the New Labour during the by election.

This election like so many recently is a straight choice on many issues.  Amazingly, the by-election has been about devolved issues, and not Westminster ones.  Little wonder. Not one word about foreign policy or the economy from a candidate whose pitch would be more appropriate for that of a local council candidate.

During the SNP conference I spoke on the recovery from recession debate, and the fact that both the Tories and New Labour were complicit in their neglect on workers rights, which has led to workplaces closing all over Scotland, because it is easier to make someone redundant here than it is elsewhere.

It transpires that the New Labour Candidate, Willie Bain was BOOED AND JEERED at the Labour Conference four years ago, because he was against Secondary Action, in debate, moved by Unite, AMICUS and the GMB, over the disgraceful way that workers in Gate Gourmet were treated by British Airways.

Here’s what he said

William Bain, from Glasgow NE, was jeered when he claimed the call amounted to a "return to the employment practices of the 1970s or '80s".
Urging delegates to be realistic, Mr Bain said: "We don't want to see the party bounced back into a shift to secondary action. It wouldn't do anything to solve this dispute. Let's learn the lessons and go forward as a movement, not back."

Members of these Three Unions, and Trade Unionists in general should reject this candidate on this alone. The CWU and postal workers would also do well to regard his mouthing of support for them with a degree of scepticism – it’s the Say Anything campaign. From pretending that he would challenge unpopular Labour policies and decisions nationally to dissociating himself from unpopular local decisions on school closures (alongside his “nothing to do with me guv” councillor colleagues), it’s the ultimate face both ways New Labour smoke and mirrors act.

So workers in Glasgow North East have a real choice, a political party who agree that Employment Rights should be strengthened and that Industrial Relations should be dealt with in a respectful manner, or New Labour who from day one have shown whose side they are really on.

The Voters of Glasgow North East must vote for a Candidate that backs working people and their hard fought struggles for dignity and rights at work (which the Labour party used to stand for), and not the Candidate who opposes the rights workers have in other countries, and who opposes ILO Conventions.

 

That’s just one of the many reasons why David Kerr deserves to win.

OUR PLACE IN EUROPE

Like Freddy Kruger, the European issue just won’t stay dead for the Tories. However, they must be calculating that there’s enough of a time lag between their climbdown on a referendum and the inevitable Spring 2009 General Election date .Tory strategists must’ve crunched the numbers and worked out that such is the state of Gordon Brown’s Weak New Labour government, that they can safely afford a leakage of rabid anti-European voters to UKIP. A calculated risk ?

Bearing in mind the fact that their blue rinse core vote of Daily Telegraph readership would be more comfortable with leaving the EEC (as they still think of it), Central office must be really sure of their ground to try to finesse this , with a message of “oh well, you can’t put the genie back in the bottle, the decision to ratify the Lisbon treaty’s already been made, it would’ve been different if you’d voted for us in 2005 .. it’s beyond our control…”

The real reason the Tories can’t stomach the European parliament and legislation is not so much a Little Britain mentality (don’t forget it was Ted Heath who was the most enthusiastic proponent of joining the EEC, and whatever her public posturing might’ve been, Margaret Thatcher signed the Single European Act) , but is really a protest against any social democratic improvements in terms of legislation to protect workers rights and makes clear their opposition to important rulings on disability and health and safety legislation (aka measures to protect people from being killed at work or made to work for peanuts that are usually described as red tape).

When the EU operates as an agent of multi-national businesses then the corporate minded polticians are usually silent.  When Brown and Blair where going round Europe after 1997, seeking opt-outs from the European Social Chapter why didn’t  they call for a referendum then?

Strange though that when the Tories where in charge that the EU was looked upon to curb the worst excesses of Thatcherism, yet when New Labour where elected the EU went the other way.

Scotland’s Climate Change Bill is seen as an international standard maker, and the outrageous decision to deny Scotland a place at the Copenhagen Summit smacks of doing Scotland down. New Labour are terrified of Scotland appearing credible on a world stage.

The quicker Scotland is at the top table in Europe the better.

GOING POSTAL

As the previous blog post shows, history is on my mind; looking back to the last time we were contemplating the real prospect of the Tory vultures returning to power – 1978/9, and part of the simplistic analysis of that era is that the intransigence of the trade unions and striking workers ushered in a Tory government. However, I would point out again the fundamental contradiction in the New Labour analysis – they manage to suggest the 1979 election result was both a push (anti- old labour vote) and a pull (pro Tory free market vote), and given that the Tory medicine has been prescribed by New Labour from Day One of Year Zero (and before, as Brown announced before the 1997 election that he’d stick to Tory spending limits), they obviously favour the “pull” argument. It would be heresy of the most heinous kind in their minds to suggest that the confrontational industrial policy imposed by the IMF on the Labour governments of the 70’s ushered in the Tories.

So I would suggest that the parallels with the post dispute are not the miners strike (as at least one backbench Labour MP has observed and his whips interview must be pending), but those of the Labour government taking on public sector workers in late seventies.

Surely the lesson is not that workers shouldn’t defend their rights but that Labour governments should support them more or lose power – discuss?

Hopefully the talks on-going will resolve the bitterness that is festering on both sides.

The most despicable aspect of this episode is the disgraceful behaviour by Royal Mail, and influenced by the hand of the Dark Lord Mandelson to attack Union rights of the Communication Workers Union, as a result of this dispute.  Documents leaked to the media showed a strategy that dates back to the Victorian days.

The facts are that Royal Mail have ripped up agreements on pay, terms and conditions, and pensions,  signed with the CWU, without consultation,, who have no other option than to withdraw their labour.

The arguments against the dispute are the same old tired ones, with an obsession in indulging in a race to the bottom. 

Back the Posties!  

THE GREAT MYTH

“I have since wondered whether those thirty-four Labour members would have voted as they did if they had been able to foresee that their vote on that evening would precipitate a General Election, at the least favourable time for the government “and I’m quoting the words of Jim Callaghan himself in his auto biography “Time and Chance”, and look who he’s pointing the finger at, Labour members in 1977 not the SNP in 1979.

Who better to analyse the circumstances of the Labour government’s demise?  He was referring to the infamous Cunningham amendment which set the 40 % Yes threshold for devolution, a democratic travesty dreamt up by the arch unionists of the day. In Callaghan’s analysis of the events of 1979 “it was the adverse result of the two Devolution referenda in Scotland and Wales that finally ended the Government’s life “. What is remarkable is his non partisan analysis of the devolution vote, and he even goes so far as to state “the merits of the case had become entangled with a vote on the Government’s popularity, which was not high even in Scotland, because of the recent industrial disputes”.

So it would appear that Labour MP’s who were anti-devolution and profoundly hostile to Scotland having additional powers scuppered the Callaghan government and ushered in Thatcher’s Tories – according to the Labour leader of the day.

There’s also a great big elephant in the room when it comes to analysing the Tory victory in 1979 – the entire foundations of New Labour are built on the premise that Old Labour was fundamentally unattractive to the voters (in the oft repeated clichés of Winter of Discontent, too much power in the hands of the trade unions etc) and therefore they must believe that a Tory victory in 1979 was inevitable…no matter when the election was held or under what circumstances the government fell?

In the minds of the shiny suits clutching filofaxes in the 80’s and fixing red roses in the buttonholes then singing along to “Things can only get better”, in 1997 that they believe Thatcher, and the superiority of private sector delivery and market values was a historical inevitability,  in other words......

..Vote New Labour, get Tory!

As true today as it was then…………….

VALUES

Yes another comeback for the blog, a bit like Frank Sinatra some might say, and I've decided to spruce this up a bit with a new look for this esteemed organ! Its been quite a summer, having got married to the Good Lady, been involved in lengthy negotiations with the employer over changes to working practices, and of course campaigning, where we have reduced a 44% deficit four years ago to 3% in the European Elections.  Now to kick on and overtake.

Despite all the negative attacks placed on the SNP by our opponents recently, we seem to still be ahead in recent polling which spells trouble for our friends in the British Labour Party (Scotland Region).

The Summer has also been dominated by New Labour double speak no more so than with the release of Al Megrahi.  In football parlance its been a dreadful pre-season for them, and one can only wonder if they can up their game in time for the Westminster election.  Can this authors prediction that they could suffer the same fate as Lloyd George's Liberals really come true?

The first double speak was over comments from some Tories over privatising parts of the NHS, whist at the same time consider papers designed to do exactly that in Engand and Wales, hence the aforementioned suspension of funding from UNISON.  Of course they still campaign in Scotland for outsourcing and more PFI, when the rest of us look on in utter bewiderment.

They continue to shout about cuts, when at the same time prepare for shaving £1 billion from the Scottish Budget.

Equally they scream about SNP councils and terms and conditions, whilst for the last 10 years Gasgow City Council have issued redundancy notices to change terms and conditions in an effective sign or be sacked policy as a matter of course.

Today was the ultimate.  To send a signal that they are at the very least comfortable at Westminster with the compassionate release of Al Megrahi, we have their Scottish Branch saying something entirely different.  They must think the electorate are fools.  To suggest that an organsation which cannot sneeze with out their Bosses in London telling them what to do, can now have separate opinions is risible.

Today we can only assume they have no values.  Values will decide the winner of the Westminster elections in Scotland.  That is the lesson from the American Presidential elections.  New Labour can only do negative because they have no values to share.

On the otherhand the people have a choice.  They can choose world class public services and the principles of social justice, peace and yes compassion.  They can choose to rebuild an economy where massive job losses are not seen as a price worth paying. 

The people of Scotland are not leaving New Labour.  New Labour have already left the Scottish people.

Voters who wish the choice of values can only now turn to the SNP.

FEEDING THE HAND THAT BITES

I am down for the UNISON Conference in Brighton, for what is a unified conference so far, after General Secretary, Dave Prentis delivered a devastating attack on New Labour, and received a standing ovation midway through his speech when he announced that he was requesting that the Labour Link section suspend funding Labour Party Constituency Development plans.

There is little doubt that this move is symbolic, and underlines the frustration of workers in the Public Sector. In a poll commissioned by UNISON 70% of Public Sector workers will not vote for Labour. Correctly the move to suspend funding is due to New Labour's attitude to public services, and for the way New Labour MP's have conducted themselves with their expenses.

How will Labour respond? If the last few weeks are anything to go by, they will have learned nothing. At a time when the PFI scam has been revealed, where more goes to private companies than is actually invested in public services, we see New Labour in Westminster and Holyrood argue that PFI is the way forward!

As Dave Prentis said "We must demand a manifesto that puts limits on privatisation. …. a manifesto that rebuilds public provision. We cannot tell our members to campaign and vote for a party whose manifesto promises more competition and more privatisation of our public services.” That why UNISON are sick of feeding the hand that bites.

Trade Union members and the public at large support Public Services being delivered by the Public Sector. They believe that privatisation only benefits the private investor.

I am glad I am a member of a political party that supports the Public Sector principle too.