LESSONS OF THE BALLOT BOX

The most illuminating aspect of the avalanche of comments and opinions aired in the aftermath of the result of the Glasgow North East by-election, is how much people reveal about themselves and their political world view in their response to the events of last Thursday. Apart from the man of the hour himself (and congratulations are due to the newly elected MP, Willie Bain, although sadly, working people may learn that he is no friend of ours, as per my last post), there has been a singularly ungracious, immodest and gloating tone from many New Labourites that doesn’t sit well with the reality of having to throw everything bar the kitchen sink at this campaign, and then some.

Yes, New Labour can still win in its heartlands and turn out the core vote, but only after a massive effort, not just in terms of activist resource ( with a high dependence on paid party workers) but also dependent on large amounts of cold, hard cash. Why was the calling of the by-election delayed for months ?  So trade union donated funds could be spent before the election expenses clock started ticking.  Funding a political party that shafts them still defies logic but whether this can be replicated across Scotland, never mind the UK is open to question, given the state of the party’s finances.

Yes, the percentage share of the vote is comparatively high as it traditionally has been in this area, but it’s hardly a ringing positive endorsement when two thirds of the voters don’t show up.  Of course there’s the issue of the scale of negativity required to scare the voters into staying with New Labour – the politics of fear and tribalism, and a ludicrous campaign stating that our city is being ripped off. Both here and in Glenrothes, the successful Labour campaigns were built on finding somebody to blame – to distract the voters from Labour’s dismal record and the hapless performance of the man who has held the purse strings since New Labour came to power.  The man who has managed the incredible feat of widening the gap between the richest and poorest in our society and squandering the best chance a Labour government will ever have to deliver social justice. In other words, they resorted to a Campaign that would not look out of place with the US Republican Party.

Our task ? Persuading people that change is possible, it doesn’t have to be this way, a better Scotland is our vision, proudly articulated from the very start of any campaign and quickly but calmly rebutting the fears and smears , exposing them for the lies they are – you have to ask, what is it about our opponents that makes them fear the Scottish people so much that they have to resort to these tactics because they believe we are not to be trusted to govern ourselves ?

It wasn’t just a re-branding exercise but a fundamental shift away from a belief in redistribution of wealth to a wholesale embrace of market forces when the Labour party became New Labour, and some people, particularly the older generation, are voting for a memory of a party that no longer exists and our challenge is to spread our message of hope, of ambition, of our vision for a modern Scotland that reflects our proud history and is positive

and relevant – not fearful and mean.  We are the true inheritors of the values that created and informed the labour and trade union movement – unlike some, we really do believe it’s possible to  "Work as if you live in the early days of a better nation.".

THE REAL CHOICE FOR WORKERS IN GLASGOW NORTH EAST

As well as campaigning in the South West of the City, I have been out in Glasgow North East, and it is simply breathtaking, the anger that voters have for New Labour because the media would have you believe differently.

What is more astonishing is the level of negative campaigning adopted by the New Labour during the by election.

This election like so many recently is a straight choice on many issues.  Amazingly, the by-election has been about devolved issues, and not Westminster ones.  Little wonder. Not one word about foreign policy or the economy from a candidate whose pitch would be more appropriate for that of a local council candidate.

During the SNP conference I spoke on the recovery from recession debate, and the fact that both the Tories and New Labour were complicit in their neglect on workers rights, which has led to workplaces closing all over Scotland, because it is easier to make someone redundant here than it is elsewhere.

It transpires that the New Labour Candidate, Willie Bain was BOOED AND JEERED at the Labour Conference four years ago, because he was against Secondary Action, in debate, moved by Unite, AMICUS and the GMB, over the disgraceful way that workers in Gate Gourmet were treated by British Airways.

Here’s what he said

William Bain, from Glasgow NE, was jeered when he claimed the call amounted to a "return to the employment practices of the 1970s or '80s".
Urging delegates to be realistic, Mr Bain said: "We don't want to see the party bounced back into a shift to secondary action. It wouldn't do anything to solve this dispute. Let's learn the lessons and go forward as a movement, not back."

Members of these Three Unions, and Trade Unionists in general should reject this candidate on this alone. The CWU and postal workers would also do well to regard his mouthing of support for them with a degree of scepticism – it’s the Say Anything campaign. From pretending that he would challenge unpopular Labour policies and decisions nationally to dissociating himself from unpopular local decisions on school closures (alongside his “nothing to do with me guv” councillor colleagues), it’s the ultimate face both ways New Labour smoke and mirrors act.

So workers in Glasgow North East have a real choice, a political party who agree that Employment Rights should be strengthened and that Industrial Relations should be dealt with in a respectful manner, or New Labour who from day one have shown whose side they are really on.

The Voters of Glasgow North East must vote for a Candidate that backs working people and their hard fought struggles for dignity and rights at work (which the Labour party used to stand for), and not the Candidate who opposes the rights workers have in other countries, and who opposes ILO Conventions.

 

That’s just one of the many reasons why David Kerr deserves to win.

OUR PLACE IN EUROPE

Like Freddy Kruger, the European issue just won’t stay dead for the Tories. However, they must be calculating that there’s enough of a time lag between their climbdown on a referendum and the inevitable Spring 2009 General Election date .Tory strategists must’ve crunched the numbers and worked out that such is the state of Gordon Brown’s Weak New Labour government, that they can safely afford a leakage of rabid anti-European voters to UKIP. A calculated risk ?

Bearing in mind the fact that their blue rinse core vote of Daily Telegraph readership would be more comfortable with leaving the EEC (as they still think of it), Central office must be really sure of their ground to try to finesse this , with a message of “oh well, you can’t put the genie back in the bottle, the decision to ratify the Lisbon treaty’s already been made, it would’ve been different if you’d voted for us in 2005 .. it’s beyond our control…”

The real reason the Tories can’t stomach the European parliament and legislation is not so much a Little Britain mentality (don’t forget it was Ted Heath who was the most enthusiastic proponent of joining the EEC, and whatever her public posturing might’ve been, Margaret Thatcher signed the Single European Act) , but is really a protest against any social democratic improvements in terms of legislation to protect workers rights and makes clear their opposition to important rulings on disability and health and safety legislation (aka measures to protect people from being killed at work or made to work for peanuts that are usually described as red tape).

When the EU operates as an agent of multi-national businesses then the corporate minded polticians are usually silent.  When Brown and Blair where going round Europe after 1997, seeking opt-outs from the European Social Chapter why didn’t  they call for a referendum then?

Strange though that when the Tories where in charge that the EU was looked upon to curb the worst excesses of Thatcherism, yet when New Labour where elected the EU went the other way.

Scotland’s Climate Change Bill is seen as an international standard maker, and the outrageous decision to deny Scotland a place at the Copenhagen Summit smacks of doing Scotland down. New Labour are terrified of Scotland appearing credible on a world stage.

The quicker Scotland is at the top table in Europe the better.